National Center for Healthy Housing
Search by Audience
Families & Consumers
Foundations & Corporations
Health, Housing, & Environmental Professionals
Researchers
Search by Healthy Home Principle
Clean
Contaminant-Free
Dry
Maintained
Pest-Free
Safe
Ventilated
Donate Now
eNewsletter
Store
Blog
home
Who We Are
Our Staff
Board Members
Science Advisory Committee
Funders
Healthy Housing Solutions
NCHH Accomplishments
NCHH Annual Reports
NCHH Publications
Employment Opportunities
NCHH Board Login
What We Do
Audiences We Serve
Families and Consumers
Foundations and Corporations
Health, Housing, and Environmental Professionals
Health Hazards, Prevention, and Solutions
Healthy Homes Principles
Researchers
Services
Research
Asthma and Allergen Sampling Study in Boston
DC Green Housing Rehabilitation
Green Rehabilitation of Elder Apartment Treatments
Health Opportunities During Weatherization Work
How Much is Too Much to Wheeze
King County Healthy Homes Demonstration Project
Lead Dust and Housing Demolition
Lead Exterior Dust on Porches
Moving Into Green Healthy Housing—The Yield
Minnesota Green Housing Rehabilitation
Non-Gov't Efforts to Address Lead Hazards
Watts and Well-Being
Window Replacement & Long-Term Lead Control
Archived Research Projects
Training
Calendar
EPA-Certified Lead Renovator Training (RRP)
Green and Healthy Housing
Healthy Homes Specialist Credential
Healthy Homes Training Center
Online Training
Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
New York State Primary Prevention Initiative
Training Initiatives
Archived Training Projects
Policy
National Policy
Policy Projects
State and Local Policy
State of Healthy Housing
National Safe and Healthy Housing Coalition
Healthy Housing Funders Collaborative
California Healthy Housing Coalition
Resources
Search NCHH Resources
Blog
HH Videos
Ask NCHH
Building Materials and Products
Consumer Survey
Healthy Housing Clearinghouse
Healthy Housing Links
Healthy Homes Contractor Listings
Lead Links
List-serves
Policy
State of Healthy Housing
Comparison by Housing Characteristic
Comparison by Housing Characteristic
Ranking
MSA Basic Housing
MSA Healthy Housing
Central City Basic Housing
Central City Healthy Housing
Location
Anaheim-Santa Ana (Orange County)
Atlanta
Baltimore
Birmingham
Boston
Buffalo
Charlotte
Chicago
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Dallas
Denver
Detroit
Fort Worth-Arlington
Hartford
Houston
Indianapolis
Kansas City
Los Angeles-Long Beach
Memphis
Miami-Hialeah
Milwaukee
Minneapolis-Saint Paul
New York City
Norfolk/Newport News
Oakland
Oklahoma City
Philadelphia
Phoenix
Pittsburgh
Portland
Providence
Rochester
Sacramento
Saint Louis
Salt Lake City-Ogden
San Antonio
San Bernardino-Riverside (metro surveys)
San Diego
San Francisco
San Jose
Seattle
Tampa-Saint Petersburg-Clearwater
Washington
Housing Characteristic
Severe physical problems
Moderate physical problems
Holes in floors
Open cracks or holes in walls
Broken plaster/peeling paint
Signs of rats
Signs of mice
Water leaks from inside
Water leaks from outside
Water supply stoppage
Flush toilet breakdown
Sewage disposal breakdown
Lacking complete plumbing
Heating equip breakdown
Room heater without flue
Exposed wiring in unit
Rooms w/o working elect. outlet
Lacking kitchen facilities
Roofing problems
Siding problems
Window problems
Foundation problems
Any Identified Problem
Supporting Documentation
Any Identified Problem
State
MSA
MSA
Central City
Outside Central City
Rental
Owner Occupied
Year
AL
Birmingham
43.0%
54.8%
38.4%
57.7%
36.9%
1998
AZ
Phoenix
33.7%
41.0%
27.3%
44.8%
28.8%
2002
CA
Anaheim-Santa Ana (Orange County)
30.1%
29.3%
30.3%
36.5%
26.5%
2002
CA
Los Angeles-Long Beach
41.8%
45.7%
37.6%
50.3%
32.8%
2003
CA
Oakland
51.6%
59.3%
50.0%
57.5%
47.6%
1998
CA
Sacramento
35.2%
40.7%
33.4%
42.3%
31.7%
2004
CA
San Bernardino-Riverside (metro surveys)
33.8%
35.6%
33.5%
42.0%
30.4%
2002
CA
San Diego
38.5%
40.1%
37.2%
44.7%
34.1%
2002
CA
San Francisco
53.0%
56.4%
50.1%
57.9%
47.9%
1998
CA
San Jose
42.6%
42.1%
43.1%
46.7%
40.0%
1998
CO
Denver
40.6%
44.7%
39.1%
46.0%
38.3%
2004
CT
Hartford
42.3%
47.6%
41.7%
46.1%
40.6%
2004
DC
Washington
38.1%
43.3%
37.1%
37.7%
38.3%
2007
FL
Miami-Hialeah
30.9%
42.4%
29.1%
35.1%
29.0%
2007
FL
Tampa-Saint Petersburg-Clearwater
30.5%
36.2%
29.0%
31.8%
30.0%
2007
GA
Atlanta
28.4%
28.5%
28.4%
33.2%
26.5%
2004
IL
Chicago
33.7%
33.7%
33.7%
35.0%
32.9%
2003
IN
Indianapolis
42.6%
48.7%
37.2%
45.8%
41.3%
2004
MA
Boston
41.6%
48.5%
39.7%
44.6%
39.7%
2007
MD
Baltimore
43.6%
55.1%
40.0%
50.2%
40.9%
2007
MI
Detroit
36.6%
48.0%
33.0%
42.4%
34.5%
2003
MN
Minneapolis-Saint Paul
34.5%
47.6%
30.9%
36.1%
34.0%
2007
MO
Kansas City
39.1%
41.8%
38.2%
40.9%
38.3%
2002
MO
Saint Louis
42.5%
59.0%
39.8%
47.5%
40.7%
2004
NC
Charlotte
31.6%
31.6%
39.0%
28.6%
2002
NY
Buffalo
46.1%
47.5%
45.6%
50.5%
44.0%
2002
NY
New York City
41.7%
47.3%
28.3%
52.1%
28.7%
2003
NY
Rochester
44.5%
51.9%
42.6%
46.8%
43.6%
1998
OH
Cincinnati
46.7%
52.9%
44.7%
47.5%
46.3%
1998
OH
Cleveland
43.0%
55.5%
39.4%
48.3%
40.9%
2004
OH
Columbus
43.2%
44.1%
42.5%
48.0%
40.7%
2002
OK
Oklahoma City
41.5%
40.2%
42.5%
49.5%
37.7%
2004
OR
Portland
38.6%
45.2%
36.1%
41.7%
37.0%
2002
PA
Philadelphia
44.7%
51.8%
41.1%
48.9%
43.1%
2003
PA
Pittsburgh
44.7%
52.1%
43.5%
49.6%
43.0%
2004
RI
Providence
43.9%
46.1%
42.9%
48.7%
41.2%
1998
TN
Memphis
42.1%
49.8%
34.8%
50.8%
37.7%
2004
TX
Dallas
47.5%
52.5%
44.6%
51.3%
45.2%
2002
TX
Fort Worth-Arlington
43.6%
45.7%
41.9%
49.1%
40.9%
2002
TX
Houston
39.2%
41.5%
37.9%
41.8%
37.9%
2007
TX
San Antonio
49.5%
53.4%
40.8%
57.3%
45.2%
2004
UT
Salt Lake City-Ogden
48.7%
55.3%
47.4%
54.2%
46.7%
1998
VA
Norfolk/Newport News
44.9%
46.1%
43.0%
50.9%
41.3%
1998
WA
Seattle
40.0%
42.4%
39.0%
40.9%
39.5%
2004
WI
Milwaukee
38.9%
45.5%
34.8%
45.2%
35.3%
2002
National Averages
Year
MSA
Central City
Outside Central City
Rental
Owner Occupied
1999
40.9
45.7
37.8
47.9
37.0
2003
36.2
40.3
33.7
43.7
32.3
2005
36.6
40.6
34.1
45.0
32.3
2007
35.7
39.0
33.6
40.5
33.2