Share NCHH's Flood Cleanup Guide with a Friend Today

Harvey, a Category 4 hurricane, arrived in the U.S. from the Gulf of Mexico August 25 and dropped an unprecedented amount of water on Texas' eastern shores, as well as Houston, the fourth largest city in the United States. 

Two weeks later, on September 10, Hurricane Irma (also Category 4) made landfall in Florida, bringing devastatingly high winds and rain to the state. A third hurricane, Maria, has devastated the island of Puerto Rico, a U.S. territory.

Several thousand homes and businesses were destroyed by Harvey, Irma, and Maria; more may be destroyed by additional hurricanes and tropical storms expected this fall; and still thousands more will sustain varying levels of wind and water damage. Some of those families and business owners will struggle to determine what within their homes and businesses can be salvaged and what must be thrown away.

That's why we're sharing Creating a Healthy Home: A Field Guide for Cleanup of Flooded Homes. We created this helpful guide to assist families in the aftermath of hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005; the guide illustrates how to restore salvageable belongings. With this hurricane and the likelihood of more extreme weather to come, we encourage people to print, share, and forward this flood guide to anyone who may benefit from it. (Note that there is also a Spanish-language edition, Crear un Hogar Saludable – Guía Práctica Para la Limpieza de Hogares Inundados.)

Additionally, here's a helpful article from The New York Times about evacuation preparedness.

Congratulations to the 15 Finalists of the Lead Poisoning Prevention Awareness Community Mini-Grant Competition

The National Center for Healthy Housing is pleased to announce the finalists of the recent lead poisoning prevention awareness community mini-grant competition. We received many exciting applications ‎– 91 applications from 30 states and the District of Columbia in total. Due to the volume and high quality of applications received, the selection committee increased the number of awards from 10 to 15. 

These mini-grants will help communities in advancing their understanding and support of lead poisoning prevention. They are intended to help gather community members and decision-makers to engage in a dialogue around actions that can advance local lead poisoning prevention efforts. Read more about the finalists and the innovative ways in which they are inspiring both conversation and action in their communities.

This competitive solicitation was led by NCHH and the Trust for America’s Health. Funding was made possible through the Health Impact Project, a collaboration between the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts.

Are you hosting a lead poisoning prevention event in your community? Whether or not you’re a grantee, there are many useful resources that can help you to plan and execute an impactful event. You can start with these helpful guides or check back in September for more resources.

Letters for FY18 Appropriations Funding to CDC, EPA, and HUD

The President's proposed budget for fiscal year 2018 includes cuts to programs within HUD, CDC, and EPA that are vital to the effort to eliminate childhood lead poisoning. These programs provide funding for lead hazard control and repair, surveillance, and follow-up services, and lead-safe renovation training and practices. 
We asked you to sign a set of letters calling on Congress to ensure that the FY18 budget contains the necessary resources to address and prevent childhood lead poisoning, including the following increased funding for HUD's Lead Poisoning Prevention and Healthy Homes Program at $230 million; increased funding for CDC's Healthy Homes and Lead Poisoning Prevention Program at $50 million; and increased funding for EPA's Lead Risk Reduction Program and lead categorical grants at a total of $25 million.
Special thanks to the Environmental Defense FundHealthy Babies Bright Futures, the Green & Healthy Homes Initiative, the Lead and Environmental Hazards Association for their work in helping to draft these letters.

Thank you to the 400-plus citizens and organizations that signed this letter. We appreciate your support.

View the letters: House | Senate

Letter text:

Honorable Congressman Rodney Frelinghuysen, Chair, House Appropriations Committee
Honorable Congresswoman Nita Lowey, Ranking Member, House Appropriations Committee

Honorable Thad Cochran, Chair, Senate Appropriations Committee
Honorable Patrick Leahy, Vice Chair, Senate Appropriations Committee

May 25, 2017

Dear __________:

The dangers lead poses to our children are well established, and support for efforts to combat lead exposure have long held bipartisan support. Yet, the Administration’s proposed budget on childhood lead poisoning drastically reduces funding for key programs at EPA, HUD, and CDC. In the wake of the tragedies in Flint, East Chicago, and elsewhere, this is not the time to reduce lead poisoning prevention funding—it is the time to meet the need. 

In its FY18 budget deliberations, we urge Congress to fund lead poisoning prevention programs for each of these three agencies: 

  • HUD’s lead hazard control and healthy homes program should be funded at $230 million.
  • CDC’s program for lead surveillance should be funded at $50 million.
  • EPA’s programs for lead hazard reduction and categorical grants for renovation, repair, and painting should be funded at a total of $25 million.
We represent thousands of parents, business leaders, professionals, and organizations working to end childhood lead poisoning, advance educational outcomes, and reduce long‐term public and private costs. Lead causes neurological damage, behavior problems, and undermines children’s long‐term learning, earnings, and health.

The nation’s efforts to address childhood lead poisoning are led by HUD, CDC, and EPA, each with their own strengths and coordinated duties. This three‐legged stool has worked well, and childhood blood lead levels have declined by over 90% since the 1990s. In brief, HUD funds abatement, CDC funds surveillance and case management, and EPA funds programs aimed at ensuring safe renovation, repair,
painting, and abatement.

However, with over half a million children who still have high blood lead levels, with 6‐10 million families relying on lead water pipes, and with 23 million homes with deteriorated lead paint, lead dust, or lead-contaminated soil, there is much more to be done. Without providing adequate resources, we as a nation will simply be forced to react to each new lead crisis, continuing to pay over $50 billion annually in avoidable lead poisoning costs. Instead of drastic cuts to and even elimination of these programs, Congress should deliver on the nation’s promise to end lead poisoning.


At HUD, Secretary Ben Carson promised at his confirmation hearings to “enhance” the Lead Poisoning Prevention and Healthy Homes program, and the President’s budget has proposed to increase the budget for that program from $110 million to $130 million; but because of proposed cuts elsewhere, HUD will actually have fewer dollars for lead hazard control, not more. For example, the President’s proposed HUD budget eliminates the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, cuts public housing maintenance and capital improvements, and eliminates or cuts other home repair programs, all of which will increase lead hazards due to fewer resources. Many local jurisdictions use CDBG to provide their local “match” funding, anywhere from 10% ‐ 25%, for lead hazard control grants. Eliminating CDBG means that fewer jurisdictions will be able to apply for lead hazard control grants. Furthermore, public housing funds are used to address lead hazards in both the near term and the long‐term; and the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME), another source of lead hazard control funding, is also slated for elimination. In short, the Administration’s overall proposed HUD budget will decrease funding for lead poisoning prevention, putting children at needless risk. Instead of increasing lead poisoning prevention funding with one hand but taking away much more with the other, we urge Congress to increase funding for the HUD lead poisoning program to $230 million; we also urge Congress to ensure that lead abatement is part of the budget for infrastructure improvements; and we urge Congress to fully fund CDBG, HOME, and public housing.


The Administration’s proposed budget would fund CDC’s Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention program,which is currently funded at $17 million, well below the $50 million needed. CDC’s lead and healthy homes program conducts needed surveillance of children exposed to lead, provides national data on childhood lead poisoning, ensures that children receive necessary case management, and enables local jurisdictions to take action before children are exposed to lead instead of reacting only after they have been harmed. Screening and surveillance data currently provide the foundation for targeting community prevention activities to areas where the risk is highest. However, many states and local jurisdictions have antiquated data systems due to inadequate funding. These systems must be modernized and standardized, not broken apart by an ill‐defined block grant program. Screening and surveillance data are also essential for carrying out needed follow‐up services for children affected by lead. These services include identification and removal of lead sources, adequate nutrition, and education and behavioral services to support the development of those affected by lead. We urge Congress to fund CDC’s lead poisoning prevention and healthy homes program at $50 million.


At EPA, an internal detailed budget memorandum calls for the elimination of the Lead Risk Reduction Program and the Lead Categorical Grants program to states, which are currently funded at $2.6 million and $14 million, respectively. These programs are critical to protecting the nation’s children from lead poisoning. This contradicts the very goal stated by the President to repair crumbling communities and lift the trajectory of America’s families. These programs support science‐based standards used to define what lead hazards are in order to protect pregnant women and vulnerable children; they require lead-safe work practices during renovation, repair, and painting work; and they ensure that consumers
seeking lead inspection, abatement, and risk assessment services can find qualified, trained individuals to perform the work properly. We urge Congress to fund these two programs at a total of $25 million.

Investment in Lead Poisoning Prevention Saves Taxpayer Money

Taxpayers already absorb the economic costs of childhood lead poisoning, estimated at $50.9 billion per year. And families, children, property owners and managers, schools, local governments, and communities across the country bear the social, educational, and medical costs of children with learning disabilities, brain damage, aggressive behavior, and long‐term health problems. For every dollar spent on controlling lead hazards, taxpayers see a return of at least $17. Countless studies have demonstrated this high return on investment. One needs to look no further than the Flint tragedy—a tragedy caused by a shortsighted scheme to supposedly save money that will in fact cost millions more to clean up—to see that programs at HUD, CDC, and EPA that protect our children should be among the nation’s top priorities. It makes good business sense; it makes good housing, public health, and environmental policy; and it’s the right thing to do.

We urge you to enable the critical contribution each of these three agencies makes to the children of the United States to continue by ensuring that HUD, CDC, and EPA receive the necessary funding to carry out their duties. Our children deserve no less.

Thank you for your consideration. Please contact Dr. David E. Jacobs of the National Safe and Healthy Housing Coalition at if we can be of further assistance.


Amanda Reddy Tom Neltner
Executive Director Chemicals Policy Director
National Center for Healthy Housing Environmental Defense Fund
Columbia, MD Washington, DC

Ruth Ann Norton Charlotte Brody
President and CEO National Director
Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Healthy Babies Bright Futures
Baltimore, MD Washington, DC

Steve Weil
Association Manager
Lead and Environmental Hazards Association
Olney, MD

House of Representatives cc:

Honorable Mario Diaz-Balart, Chair, House HUD Appropriations Subcommittee
Honorable David Price, Ranking Member, House HUD Appropriations Subcommittee

Honorable Ken Calvert, Chair, House Interior/Environment Appropriations Subcommittee 
Honorable Betty McCollum, Ranking Member, House Interior/Environment Appropriations

Honorable Tom Cole, Chair, House HHS Appropriations Subcommittee
Honorable Rosa DeLauro, House HHS Appropriations Subcommittee

Senate cc:

Honorable Susan Collins, Chair, Senate HUD Appropriations Subcommittee
Honorable Jack Reed, Ranking member, Senate HUD Appropriations Subcommittee

Honorable Lisa Murkowski, Chair, Senate Interior/Environment Appropriations Subcommittee
Honorable Tom Udall, Ranking Member, Senate Interior/Environment Appropriations Subcommittee

Honorable Roy Blunt, Chair, HHS Senate Appropriations Subcommittee
Honorable Patty Murray, Ranking Member, HHS Senate Appropriations Subcommittee

Flint and Beyond: Lead Poisoning Remains a Critical Public Health Issue

As the lead-in-water crisis in Flint, Michigan continues to evolve, NCHH joins the nation in supporting the residents of Flint in their time of need. Resources must be marshaled as quickly as possible to ensure a safe water supply and provide follow-up services to address the long-term consequences of lead poisoning. We need to take the lessons from this crisis to improve our public policies so that no other communities have to experience what the residents of Flint are going through.

Due to the media attention generated by the crisis in Flint, NCHH has received many inquiries about lead poisoning and what parents can do to protect their children. Many have told us that they thought that the problem of lead was solved decades ago. The truth is that industry mined massive quantities of lead over the last century and put that lead into many products that went into our homes, including pipes and solder, paints and glazes, and other consumer products. Although lead was banned from new residential paint in 1978 and from new plumbing in 1986, residents may still be exposed to lead from products that remain in older homes. Lead was also added to gasoline for on-road use until 1996, and as vehicles burned the gas, the lead was left behind in the dust and soil in our communities.

After decades of sustained research and action, the percentage of children who have been lead-exposed is much lower than it was in the 1980s. Yet lead exposure remains a threat for far too many people.

To learn more about the issue of lead in water, the role NCHH has played in the fight against lead poisoning, and what every parent should know to protect their families from lead exposure, click here.